Summary:
Utility windows (NET::Utility/_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_UTILITY) should
not be on the Task Manager, but they should be on the Pager. This
patch achieves this by evaluating the window type in the
AbstractTasksModel::SkipTaskBar data role.
I considered the alternative approach of making a new
AbstractTasksModel::IsUtilityWindow (or similar) data role and
adding a pass to evaluate it to TaskFilterProxyModel, then
configuring the filter models in TasksModel and the Pager backend
differently. But this is not very extensible. Then I realized that
AbstractTasksModel data roles do not and should not reflect X11
idioms anyway; the point of the library is to abstract for the
purpose of UI, and what XWindowTasksModel considers "SkipTaskBar"
is really an implementation detail. This makes all the more sense
considering on Wayland we have no notion of window types (beyond
"popup") yet, and don't quite now how it's going to evolve.
Various API docstrings have been changed to better reflect that
the meaning of the data role doesn't map to anything specific in
the tasks.
BUG:368956
Reviewers: #plasma, davidedmundson, broulik
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2807
Summary: For use by desktop pagers using libtaskmanager.
Reviewers: #plasma, davidedmundson
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2674
Summary:
Avoids problems stemming from libtaskmanager and plasma-framework's
AppletInterface::screen numbering screens differently (QScreen order
vs. who knows what).
CCBUG:365246
Reviewers: #plasma, graesslin, mart
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D2143
Summary:
Acts like requestVirtualDesktops only with a QStringList
make runningActivities invokable
Test Plan: See subsequent plasma-desktop review
Reviewers: hein, #plasma
Reviewed By: hein, #plasma
Subscribers: hein, mart, plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1814
Summary: clang-check as well cppcheck complains about it
Test Plan: builds
Reviewers: hein, #plasma
Reviewed By: hein, #plasma
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1962
Summary:
Makes the API more complex, but it's worth it as it allows
knowledgable users to opt into avoding costly work and/or
data copies in very common use cases.
Significantly speeds up a lot of work in the models in the
presence of X apps that can't be identified and fall back to
the window icon.
Based on profiling by David.
Reviewers: dfaure, davidedmundson
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1920
Summary:
Makes the API more complex, but it's worth it as it allows
knowledgable users to opt into avoding costly work and/or
data copies in very common use cases.
Significantly speeds up a lot of work in the models in the
presence of X apps that can't be identified and fall back to
the window icon.
Based on profiling by David.
Reviewers: dfaure, davidedmundson
Subscribers: plasma-devel
Tags: #plasma
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1920